For some time, I have appealed to my senators, Susan Collins and Olympia Snowe, for help in addressing the poor, pitiful management of wild horses by the Bureau of Land Management. The mustangs deserve better. Heck, as taxpayers, we are paying for the round ups! We deserve better.
This week, Senator Collins sent a response and included a letter from BLM director Robert Abbey and this letter from Secretary of the Interior Ken Salazar, originally sent last year to members of Congress.
In this letter dated October 7, 2009, Secretary of the Interior wrote to Senate
Majority Leader Harry Reed (D, Nevada). Identical letters were sent to other
legislators serving on relevant committees.
Please add your comments!
I am
writing to enlist your help to better protect the wild horses that are proud
symbols of America’s heritage and to better manage the open lands on which they
roam.
Since
1971, when Congress passed the Wild-Free-Roaming Horses and Burros Act, the
Department of the Interior's Bureau of Land Management has proudly managed the
Nation’s wild horses and burros. In four decades under the BLM’s protection,
wild horse populations that were once “fast disappearing from the American
scene” have returned to rapid growth.
Now,
the wild horse hers and the landscapes on which they live face new challenges.
As wild horses have no natural predators, the herds have grown substantially.
The total wild horse and burro population is now approximately 69,000. This
number includes approximately 37,000 currently roaming the public land, and approximately 32,000 held in expensive
short-term corrals and long-term pastures. By contrast, in 1971, the total
population was approximately 25,000.
Population
increases have resulted in steadily increasing program costs – from $38.8
million in Fiscal Year 2007, to $53 million in Fiscal Year 2009, to a budget
request of $69 million for Fiscal Year 2010.
Population
increases have resulted in steadily increasing program costs – from $38.8
million in Fiscal Year 2007, to $53 million in Fiscal Year 2009, to a budget
request of $69 million for Fiscal Year 2010.
Additionally,
arid western lands and watersheds cannot support a population this large
without significant damage to the environment. To prevent starvation of animals
and to protect the lands from over-grazing, the BLM each year moves thousands
of wild horses to short-term corrals and long-term pastures.
The
current path of the wild horse and burro program is not sustainable for the
animals, the environment, or the taxpayer.
The current path of the wild horse and burro program is not sustainable for the animals, the environment, or the taxpayer
The Government Accountability Office
noted in a recent report that the wild horse and burro program is at a
“critical crossroads,” affirmed the need for action to control off-range holding
costs, and recommended that the BLM work with Congress to find a responsible
way to manage the increasing number of unadopted horses. The Senate Committee
on Appropriations Report for the Department’s Fiscal Year 2010 budget noted
that gathering and holding costs “have risen beyond sustainable levels” and
directed the BLM to prepare a long-term plan for the program.
To
respond to these challenges, I am proposing to develop new approaches that will
require bold efforts from the Administration and from Congress to put this
program on a more sustainable track, enhance the conservation for these iconic
animals, and provide better value for the taxpayer.
First,
I proposed that the United States establish a new set of wild horse preserves
across the Nation, particularly on the productive grasslands of the Midwest and
in the East.
I proposed that the United States establish a new set of wild horse preserves
across the Nation, particularly on the productive grasslands of the Midwest and
in the East.
We must consider siting these preserves in areas outside the
Western States because water and forage are extremely limited in the West, and
drought and wildfire threaten both rangeland and animal health. These new
preserves would be located on lands (or interests in lands) acquired by the
BLM, and/or partners, and would be home to non-reproducing herds of wild
horses. They would provide excellent opportunities to celebrate the historic
significance of wild horses, showcase these animals to the American public, and
serve as natural assets that support local tourism and economic activity.
The
national wild horse preserves would be managed by the BLM or through
cooperative agreements between the BLM and private non-profit organizations or
other partners, thereby reducing our existing off-range holding costs and
harnessing the considerable energy of our most enthusiastic wild horse
supporters. We would also explore the availability of new grazing areas that
could accommodate a large number of wild horses and could be managed through
partnerships with existing conservation programs. Partners would also
contribute to the wild horse and burro program by promoting adoptions.
Second,
to showcase the unique herds on public lands in the West that deserve special
recognition, I propose to highlight those special herds with Secretarial or
possibly Congressional designations.
Special designations would high light the
unique qualities of America’s wild horses, providing a focal point for
publicity and increased eco-tourism that could boost the economies of nearby
rural communities.
Special designations would high light the
unique qualities of America’s wild horses, providing a focal point for
publicity and increased eco-tourism that could boost the economies of nearby
rural communities.
Finally,
I propose new strategies to ensure that the herds on our western rangelands are
kept at more sustainable levels. We must balance population growth rates with
adoption demand. Only be reducing breeding populations of wild horses on
western rangelands will this program come into balance. This will require
aggressive use of fertility control, active management of sex ratios on the
range, and possibly the introduction of non-reproducing herds in some existing
herd management areas. At the same time, we must also place more animals into
good homes by making our adoptions more flexible where appropriate.
These
proposals set forth my vision for responding to Congress and GAO’s direction to
address the many challenges facing the wild horse and burro program. I am
confident that these measures can provide a truly national solution to a
concern that is not limited to the West. They will restore balance and health
to our wild horse and burro herds, improve the management of the program,
promote rangeland health, and create a lasting conservation legacy for these
iconic animals.
These
proposals are subject to Congressional approval and appropriations. I look
forward to discussing them with you and other members of Congress as we work
together to protect and manage America’s “Living Legends.”
Sincerely,
Ken
Salazar